Public Notice Provided to All Federal Employees and
Agency Personnel Including IRS/Internal Revenue
Service and Treasury Personnel:
Social Security Numbers can only be issued to federal “employees” /
“citizens” for use only in the performance of their official duties. See 20
CFR §422.104. SSN’s used as TIN’s apply to the same Persons/PERSONS.
That is, only federal Persons (Territorials) or PERSONS (Municipals) can be issued
Social Security Account Numbers/TIN’s and that is the way it has always been,
except…….
FDR and the Federal WWII Era Congress got around this and included millions of
patriotic Americans by conscripting “volunteers” who agreed to pay federal income
taxes as a “Victory Tax”. They did this by arbitrarily defining such voluntary
taxpayers as Withholding Agents— Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marines.
The Victory Tax was supposed to sunset upon the “cessation of hostilities”, however,
in September of 1945, Congress conveniently forgot to put a specific end date on
this arrangement and the Internal Revenue Service continued to collect –thus
changing this from a voluntary arrangement to help win the war– to an international
extortion racket.
This is your reminder that the Second World War hostilities ended in September of
1945.
Any American “volunteer” who isn’t actually and naturally eligible for Social Security
and who wishes to “retire” from the presumption of federal service and who revokes
their election to pay federal taxes must be immediately set free and permanently
released from any obligation to report, to pay, or accept responsibility for any federal
Person/PERSON, and cannot otherwise be encumbered, imposed upon, or subjected
by any agency or department of the federal territorial or municipal government (s).
Compulsory “citizenship” does not exist.
Those who have “retired” after becoming vested in the Social Security System as a
result of this abuse are owed all their money back and/or all services promised at the
time of their enrollment with no presumption of continued federal citizenship or its
obligations attaching to them.
The continued issuance of Social Security Numbers to people who aren’t actually
federal employees and either United States Citizens or citizens of the United States is
illegal entrapment under conditions of non-disclosure and deceit; it results in
mischaracterization of political status, involuntary servitude, identity theft, unlawful
conversion of assets and other evils of racketeering committed against Americans
who have been deliberately misinformed and told that they have to enroll in Social
Security as a requirement of having a job—-any job.
Enrollment in Social Security is only required if they happen to be seeking direct
employment with the federal government or are otherwise legitimately considered
federal government dependents—verifiable political asylum seekers, etc.
Those born in one of the actual states of the Union who retire from such
employment, including military employment, or who, owing no natural allegiance to
the Territorial or Municipal governments, and having never been employed by the
federal government(s), simply realize these facts and revoke their “election” to pay
federal income taxes and cease thereafter to function as voluntary Withholding
Agents must be set free from the presumption of any further territorial or municipal
obligation.
A similar entrapment occurs when American State Citizens are encouraged to vote in
federal and federated state/county elections. When they “register” to vote, they
unknowingly give up their rights as stockholders and electors — an undisclosed loss
— and they become “enfranchised” as presumed operators of federal corporation
franchises. This sleight-of-hand conversion of Americans from electors into mere
voters again serves to mischaracterize them and defraud them and subject them and
deprive them of their natural birth right and material interests at the hands of people
who are in fact their employees.
As none of these losses and obligations are ever fully disclosed no valid private
contract can be alleged and any American who subsequently rescinds a voter
registration must be removed from all registration data bases and held harmless
from any presumption of federal enfranchisement.
Let’s just use this one small example of the Big Lie federal employees have been told
and that they have been enforcing upon others…..continuing from (1) quoting from
Christopher Chapman now:
Ҥ422.104. Who can be assigned a social security number.
(a) Persons eligible for SSN assignment. We can assign you a social security number
if you meet the evidence requirements in §422.107 and you are:
(1) A United States citizen; or
(2) An alien lawfully admitted to the United States….
Let’s examine the definition of United States (U.S.) used in Title 26 to see if average
Americans who are not employed by the federal government are a citizens of the
U.S…..
In most statutes (statute law) the Unites States referred to is federal territory, just
as it is in Title 26—- i.e.:
26 U.S. Code § 7701 – Definitions
(9) United States
The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes only the States
and the District of Columbia.
(10) State —-The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of
Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
The term “State” exposes the truth that term “United States” means the District of
Columbia and no other.
Let us review, specifically the history of the evolution of this term
The code of Federal Regulation is very definitive by using the word “its”, in lieu of,
“their”
Title 26 CFR § 1.1-1(a)(1) provides, in pertinent part:
(1) Section 1 of the [Internal Revenue] Code imposes an income tax on the income
of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States ….
(c) Who is a citizen. Every person born or naturalized in the United States and
subject and subject to its [District of Columbia] jurisdiction is a citizen.
The 1939 Code through 1954 the definition of “State”:
IRC 1954:
Alaska is a U.S. Territory
Hawaii is a U.S. Territory
· 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the Territories and
the District of Colombia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the
provisions of this title.
Alaska joins the Union, strikeout “Territories” and substitute “Territory of Hawaii”:
Revision 1:
Alaska is a State of the Union
Hawaii is a U.S. Territory
7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the Territory of Hawaii
and the District of Colombia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the
provisions of this title.
Hawaii joins the Union, strikeout “the Territory of Hawaii and” immediately after the
word “include”:
Revision 2
Alaska is a State of the Union
Hawaii is a State of the Union
· 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of
Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title.
Notice how Alaska and Hawaii only fit these definitions of [Territorial] “State” before
they were declared to be States of the United States of America, and now are hereby
admitted into the Union on equal footing with the original States, in all respects
whatsoever.[emphasis added]
Let’s examine some court cases that further solidifies this subject:
Before the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868:
A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to be, and called a citizen of
the United States, although technically and abstractly there is no such thing. To
conceive a citizen of the United States who is not a citizen of some one of the States,
is totally foreign to the idea, and inconsistent with the proper construction and
common understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution, which must be
deduced from its various other provisions. The object then to be attained, by the
exercise of the power of naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective
States. [Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)] [bold emphasis added]
It is true, every person, and every class and description of persons, who were at the
time of the adoption of the Constitution recognized as citizens in the several States,
became also citizens of this new political body; but none other; it was formed by
them, and for them and their posterity, but for no one else. And the personal rights
and privileges guarantied [sic] to citizens of this new sovereignty were intended to
embrace those only who were then members of the several state communities, or
who should afterwards, by birthright or otherwise, become members, according to
the provisions of the Constitution and the principles on which it was founded. [Dred
Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 404 (1856)] [emphasis added]
… [F]or it is certain, that in the sense in which the word “Citizen” is used in the
federal Constitution, “Citizen of each State,” and “Citizen of the United States,” are convertible terms; they mean the same thing; for “the Citizens of each State are entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States,” and “Citizens of the United States” are, of course, Citizens of all the United
States. [44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J. dissenting][italics in original, underlines & C’s added] As it was the adoption of the Constitution by the Conventions of nine States that established and created the United States, it is obvious there could not then have
existed any person who had been seven years a citizen of the United States, or who possessed the Presidential qualifications of being thirty-five years of age, a natural born citizen, and fourteen years a resident of the United States. The
United States* in these provisions, means the States united. To be twenty-five years of age, and for seven years to have been a citizen of one of the States which ratifies the Constitution, is the qualification of a representative. To be a natural borncitizen of one of the States which shall ratify the Constitution, or to be a citizen of one of said States at the time of such ratification, and to have attained the age of thirty-five years, and to have been fourteen years a resident within one of the said States, are the Presidential qualifications, according to the true meaning of the Constitution. [People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870)] [bold and underline emphasis added] After the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868: It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United States and a
citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other and which depend upon
different characteristics or circumstances in the individual. [Slaughter House Cases,
83 U.S. 36] [(1873) emphasis added]
The first clause of the fourteenth amendment made negroes citizens of the United
States, and citizens of the State in which they reside, and thereby created two classes of citizens, one of the United States and the other of the state. [Cory et al.
v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327][(1874) headnote 8, emphasis added]
We have in our political system a Government of the United States** and a
government of each of the several States.Each one of these governments is distinct
from the others, and each has citizens of its own ….[U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S.
542] [(1875) emphasis added]
One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States.
Thomasson v. State, 15 Ind. 449; Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738);
McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis. 443. [McDonel v. State, 90
Ind. 320, 323][(1883) underlines added]
A person who is a citizen of the United States** is necessarily a citizen of the
particular state in which he resides. But a person may be a citizen of a particular
state and not a citizen of the United States. To hold otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, — the right to declare who are its citizens.[State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380] [6 S. 602 (1889), emphasis added] The first clause of the fourteenth amendment of the federal Constitution made negroes citizens of the United States, and citizens of the state in which they
reside, and thereby created two classes of citizens, one of the United States** and
the other of the state.
[4 Dec. Dig. ’06, p. 1197, sec. 11]
[“Citizens” (1906), emphasis added]
There are, then, under our republican form of government,two classes of citizens,
one of the United States** and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in
a person, without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia;
but both classes usually exist in the same person.[Gardina v. Board of Registrars,
160 Ala. 155]
[48 S. 788, 791 (1909), emphasis added]
There is a distinction between citizenship of the United States** and citizenship of a
particular state, and a person may be the former without being the latter.
[Alla v. Kornfeld, 84 F.Supp. 823] [(1949) headnote 5, emphasis added]
A person may be a citizen of the United States** and yet be not identified or
identifiable as a citizen of any particular state.[Du Vernay v. Ledbetter] [61 So.2d
573, emphasis added]
… citizens of the District of Columbia were not granted the privilege of litigating in
the federal courts on the ground of diversity of citizenship. Possibly no better reason
for this fact exists than such citizens were not thought of when the judiciary article
[III] of the federal Constitution was drafted. … citizens of the United States** …
were also not thought of; but in any event a citizen of the United States**, who is
not a citizen of any state, is not within the language of the [federal] Constitution.
[Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914] [emphasis added]
That there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, and the
privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other is well established by
the decisions of the courts of this country. [Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)]
No fortifying authority is necessary to sustain the proposition that in the United
States a double citizenship exists. A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the
Federal Government and at the same time a citizen of the State in which he resides.
Determination of what is qualified residence within a State is not here necessary.
Suffice it to say that one possessing such double citizenship owes allegiance and is
entitled to protection from each sovereign to whose jurisdiction he is subject.
[Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp. 383 (USDC/WDMO 1953)]
The privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects very
few rights because it neither incorporates any of the Bill of Rights nor protects all
rights of individual citizens. See Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21
L.Ed. 394 (1873). Instead, this provision protects only those rights peculiar to being
a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to
state citizenship.
[Jones v. Temmer, 829 F.Supp. 1226 (USDC/DCO 1993)]” unquote Christopher
Chapman.
In conclusion….
Attacking Americans who are not obligated in any way to pay federal income taxes,
and certainly not obligated to pay “municipal” taxes merely disguised more generally
as “federal” taxes, is against the law, both statutory and Public. Coercing exempt
persons and/or denying their claim of exemption is a criminal act of extortionate
racketeering and inland piracy.
There are American state nationals (people who live as non-federal, non-citizens)
and American State Citizens (who occupy public offices of the land jurisdiction
states). These are distinctly different groups within one Body Politic which is foreign
to the “United States” as defined in Title 26 and throughout Federal Code.
None of them are naturally liable to pay federal income taxes and none of them are
subject to territorial or municipal law. The sooner IRS employees become fully
acquainted with these facts and the limitations of their powers and jurisdictions with
respect to these Americans, the better for everyone involved.
These facts are unwritten by the most fundamental principles giving rise to the
government of this country. Please note the following:
The limited and exclusive power of legislation conferred on the Congress and the
geographic authority of these powers is summed up by these controlling sections of
the actual Constitution:
“power of personal and subject-matter legislation throughout the Union and upon the
high seas at Art, I, § 8, cl. 1-16;
“power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation over (what will be) the
District of Columbia at Art, I, § 8, cl. 17; and
“constructive (implied) power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation
at Art. IV, § 3, cl. 2 in the form of ‘Rules and Regulations,’ id., ‘respecting the
Territory or other Property belonging to the United States,’ id., i.e., federal territories
and enclaves.
Please note that the Constitution confers upon Congress no power of territorial
legislation over any person or property anywhere in the Union.
Unless a person is naturally and/or truly voluntarily subject to the Territorial “United
States” defined as the District of Columbia in Title 26, they cannot be subjected as a
Municipal citizen, either; and Congress has no delegated legislative power allowing it
to usurp its territorial or municipal authority upon the actual states and people
otherwise.
Read that as—-no means no. There’s a difference between consensual sex and
rape.
When people born on the land of one of the actual organic states claim their nonterritorial, non-municipal, non-citizen political status and give evidence of the same
intention by issuing an Act of Expatriation from the presumption of Territorial
citizenship, and the surrender of the Municipal PERSON issued to them back to the
Secretary of the Treasury, and otherwise give Notice of their revocation of election to
pay federal income taxes or to otherwise subject themselves and their assets to any
territorial or municipal code, that decision must be respected and adhered to by all
agents of the territorial and municipal government without question or exception.
You can tax actual federal territorial and municipal employees all you like. You can
tax political asylum seekers and immigrants. You can tax people who are knowingly
and voluntarily officers and employees of federally chartered corporations.
What you cannot do is to blindly assume that the existence of a Social Security
Number and Masterfile Account establishes any valid basis for presuming (1) the
political status of any individual or (2) any basis for assuming and assessing federal
tax liabilities or other merely presumed obligations.
This circumstance is the result of self-interested mismanagement of federal agencies
and departments for several generations. It derives from wholesale distribution of
Social Security Numbers and accounts by the Social Security Administration without
respect for the limitations imposed by the actual law and without full disclosure to
applicants. It derives from purposeful efforts of the Congress to receive income from
Americans under false pretenses—the presumption that they are knowingly and
willingly acting as “volunteer” Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marine Service. Most
of all, it results from widespread ignorance among Revenue Agents, federal program
administrators, and the general public.
All federal employees, all federal Territorial and Municipal citizens, all federal
program administrators and managers need to be fully cognizant of these facts and
you are encouraged to share them with your staff, your domestic judicial officers,
your family and your friends.
Federal service is meant to be an honorable occupation worthy of respect and
support, but when it devolves to purposeful racketeering against the people this
same service is meant to serve, prosecution and conflict is the inevitable result.
It is important for federal employees –especially revenue agents and federal
territorial and municipal judicial officers— to realize that when they misapply the law
and contribute to these self-interested confusions they are committing serious crimes
of racketeering, unlawful conversion of assets, inland piracy, personage, and barratry
against their employers and benefactors. These international crimes against
Americans have been promoted by the federal governmental services corporations
under a pretense of war and wartime necessity. It is therefore necessary to also
address this claim.
The Territorial aka “Federal” Government was created in 1868 in the wake of what is
misleadingly called the “American Civil War” upon the release of the so-called
Federal Constitution. This document, the “Constitution of the United States of
America” presents articles of incorporation for a corporation doing business as the
“United States of America” cleverly disguised via similar names deceit to resemble
the actual Constitution.
Please note that the actual constitution is: “The Constitution for the united States of
America”, not “the Constitution of the United States of America”. And both these
documents are different from the municipal constitution called the “Constitution of
the United States”.
This conflict, the so-called “Civil War” was in fact an illegal commercial mercenary
conflict taking place on our shores. It was never declared by any action of the united
States of America in Congress Assembled, and it was never resolved by any peace
treaty. Instead, President Johnson declared peace on the land jurisdiction via three
public declarations creating a binding contract mandating peace—once again
underscoring the fact that this was a commercial mercenary action and no form of
actual “war” at all.
Ever since then there has been no sovereign government invoked and no competent
land jurisdiction Congress of the actual states of the Union has been convened. As a
result, all so-called “wars” have instead been commercial mercenary actions carried
out by corporations and/or internal domestic police actions.
Read that as: Congress has no “war powers”. “War” has specific requirements and
definitions under international law, and twist and turn as they might, the members of
Congress— as that body has operated since 1860 —cannot declare actual war or
take refuge in any claim of war powers or any doctrine of necessity with respect to
the actual states and people of the Union. What began as a fraudulent and illegal
commercial mercenary action remains a fraudulent and illegal commercial mercenary
action subject to prosecution as fraud.
It should surprise nobody that the actions of Congress seeking to enrich itself and to
usurp against the lawful government of the actual United States by bolstering its
territorial hegemony and deceptively terming it the [territorial] “United States” as
seen in Title 26, is conceived in fraud and word-smithing and similar names deceits
going back six generations.
All Territorial (States of States) and Municipal (STATES OF STATES) are merely
franchises of self-interested federal commercial corporations. They have no vested
authority related to the American states and people and have fraudulently usurped
upon the jurisdiction and property assets of their employers.
Without the ability to engage in actual war these various commercial corporations
have rampaged around under false pretenses and have criminally trespassed on the
Americans they are supposed to provide with “essential government services”. They
have also caused a great deal of trouble throughout the rest of the world.
As federal employees and as citizens of the Territorial and Municipal “United States”
it is very important for you to become fully aware of the limitations of your position
of limited delegated authority and the substantially unfavorable circumstances
created by these past actions, events, and public policies espoused by these various
incorporated entities.
You should also know that there is no “state” immunity available to invoke as
protection against your actions as employees of commercial corporations and in most
cases, your offices are not properly insured or bonded. The sovereign government of
this country is vested entirely in the American people and their jural assemblies at
both the county and state levels. Their states are the only ones enjoying sovereign
immunity.
This Public Notice is provided in the interest of avoiding unnecessary conflicts
between Americans and their federal employees.
All legal presumptions regarding political status based on the existence of Social
Security Numbers and Masterfile Accounts are being based on insupportable
evidences obtained under conditions of non-disclosure and semantic deceit and
implemented via the purposeful World War II Victory Tax circumvention of the actual
law pertaining to the issuance of Social Security Numbers.
Such presumptions of federal territorial or federal municipal citizenship cannot be
maintained in the face of direct objection and reasonable proof of revocation by
American state nationals and American State Citizens.
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents
The American States and People
c/o 1336 Staubbach Circle
Anchorage, Alaska 99508
